Api Integration Government Bids & RFPs

Contractors must be registered in the system for awardmanagement www. ***. *. *

The proposal due date is August 19th, 2026, at 12:00 PM PST.

Proposals will be evaluated based on administrative proposal, technical proposal, value-added services, and price.

Proposers must demonstrate at least five years of experience in large-scale system integration projects, preferably within Medicaid or other public health systems, and have successfully completed at least one project of similar scope and complexity within the last five years.

A pre-proposal conference will not be held.

Protests to the RFP must be received by the due date and time identified in the schedule. Protests to an amendment must be received by the due date identified in the amendment.

Agencies may reject a proposal if the proposer fails to substantially comply with RFP procedures, has delinquent debt owed to the state, fails to meet responsibility requirements, or makes inappropriate contact with state representatives.

The RFQ was released on July 31, 2026, and quotes are due by August 31, 2026, at 11:00 am ET. Technical demonstrations are scheduled for September, with an anticipated award date in October.

USAC will award a single contract to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to USAC, price and other factors considered. The evaluation factors are technical, experience and past performance, and price.

Offerors must be authorized sellers/partners/resellers capable of providing the required products/services. They must also have an active registration in www. ***. *. * at the time of quote submission and contract award.

Failure to participate in a required technical demonstration will result in disqualification. Quotes exceeding page limits will be considered technically unacceptable.

Responses must be submitted electronically no later than 8:00 pm eastern /5:00 pm pacific time on August 21, 2026.

The government is highly interested in sources possessing or having a clear path to obtaining the appropriate facility and personnel security clearances to work on controlled and, where applicable, classified information systems and subsystems.

No new questions will be accepted after 5:00 pm eastern time on August 10, 2026.

To prevent an organizational conflict of interest (OCI), the government intends to strictly separate the integrator role from the component development role. The selected integrator track B will not be permitted to develop or supply the underlying technology components track A.

Proposals must be received by Wednesday, September 2, 2026, at 11:00 am EST. Proposal due date Wednesday, September 2, 2026, at 11:00 am submit proposals on bidnetdirect. com est

Proposals will be evaluated based on methodology and approach (25%), qualifications, experience, and references (25%), proposed timelines and schedules (10%), project understanding and overall quality/completeness (10%), and price proposal (30%). the evaluation criteria by which proposals from responsible offerors will be evaluated and ranked. the proposal will be evaluated for the following factors: evaluation criteria weight methodology and approach 25 qualifications, experience, and references of the firm and any 25 subcontractors proposed timelines and schedules 10 project understanding and overall quality and completeness of 10 proposal price proposal 30 total 100

Offerors must have appropriate financial resources, equipment, facility, and personnel; ability to meet performance and delivery schedules; a satisfactory record of performance and ethics; and a history of compliance with laws and regulations. appropriate financial resources, equipment, facility, and personnel resources to furnish the goods and services. ability to meet the required performance and delivery schedules, considering existing business commitments. a satisfactory record of performance and business with a successful history of providing goods and services to public andor private entities, particularly to transit agencies similar to aaata.

Disqualification may result from communication with AAATA staff other than the contracting officer, failure to comply with RFP instructions, or submitting unapproved contracts or exceptions. communication by a proposer or a proposers representative with aaata staff, consultants, board members, or representatives other than the contracting officer or solicitation point of contact is prohibited and will be grounds for disqualification.