Dock Architecture Government Bids & RFPs

Proposals must be submitted no later than 1:00pm on October 9, 2026. no later than 1: 00pm on october 9, 2026

Contractors must provide references for similar work completed in the last 3 years and a certificate of insurance. references for similar work completed in the last 3 years.

To arrange a site visit, contact Mike Lodice at 203 **** make arrangement to view the work site, please contact mike - town of woodbury, connecticut

Packages or partial packages received beyond the listed time will not be opened and will not be considered. packages or partial packages received beyond the listed time will not be opened and will not be considered.

The ordering period is from contract award to 09 August 2027. The anticipated performance period for the ship repair work is 05 January 2027 - 09 May 2027.

Payment will be made by the Commanding Officer, USCG Finance Center. Invoices shall be itemized to correlate to the schedule of supplies/services and submitted electronically using the Invoice Processing Platform (IPP).

The government will award a contract to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the government, price and other factors considered. The evaluation factors are price, technical capability, and past performance, with technical capability being more important than past performance, and combined technical capability and past performance being significantly more important than price.

Offerors must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Subpart 9. 1. Proof of enrollment in E-Verify and a statement of coverage from current insurance carrier are required.

Prospective offerors are encouraged to visit the cutter and visually inspect each item of work. Costs of attendance are solely born by the attendees.

Failure to read the specifications in their entirety will not relieve the offeror from responsibility for properly estimating the difficulty or price of successfully performing the work. Failure to meet any due date will be considered late.

Proposals are due by 11:00 AM PST on September 1, 2026. Proposals due: 11:00 am pst, september 1, 2026

The City will remit payment within 30 calendar days of receiving an undisputed, accurate, and approved invoice. The City will remit payment within 30 calendar days of receiving an undisputed, accurate, and approved invoice.

Proposals shall be evaluated based on organizational capacity and experience (50%), method of approach and quality management (30%), communication and reporting (15%), and reasonableness of cost (5%). Proposals shall be consistently evaluated based upon the following criteria: Criteria Weight 1. Organizational Capacity Experience. . . 2. Method of Approach and Quality Management. . . 3. Communication and Reporting. . . 4. Reasonableness of Cost

Minimum qualifications include the ability to conduct business in the City, not having been debarred, and relevant experience in naval architecture and marine engineering projects. Licensed Professional Engineers familiar with vessel design principles and governing standards and regulations are required. Minimum Qualifications Qualification to conduct business in the City not having been debarred by federal, state or local government relevant experience in naval architecture and marine engineering projects. Required licensed professional engineers, familiar with vessel design principles and governing standards and regulations

Contractors and subcontractors are subject to penalties under labor code sections ****, ****, ****, and **** for failure to comply with labor code **** et seq. Penalties: Contractor and subcontractors are subject to penalties, including, but not limited to, under labor code ****, ****, **** and ****, for failure to comply with labor code **** et seq.

A protest must be submitted within five (5) business days of the electronic notification of intent to award. A proposer desiring to submit a protest for a proposal must do so within five 5 business days of the electronic notification of intent to award.

Proposals may be rejected if they appear unrealistic in technical commitments, lack technical competence, or indicate a failure to comprehend the complexity and risk of the contract. Misrepresentation of facts in the proposal can also lead to disqualification. Proposals which appear unrealistic in the terms of technical commitments, lack of technical competence, or are indicative of failure to comprehend the complexity and risk of this contract, may be rejected.