This is a Request for Quote (RFQ) for a turnkey virtual patient observation monitoring system solution for the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System. The contract is intended to be a firm fixed price with four option years. Installation and training are required at two separate locations in Pittsburgh, PA. Offers must be submitted via email to Nathan Lohr by **** at 4 pm. A Letter of Authorization (LOA) from the OEM is required for award. The evaluation is based on best value, considering technical features, past performance, SOW compliance, delivery/installation, and warranty, with non-price factors being more important than price.
Installation must be completed no later than 180 days after receipt of order. Installation must be completed no later than 180 days after receipt of order aro.
Invoices shall be submitted upon receipt, inspection, and acceptance. invoices shall be submitted in arrears: . . . x upon receipt, inspection, and acceptance.
The contractor shall provide help desk support, analytic reporting consultation, and warranty services for one year post go live. contractor shall provide help desk support, analytic reporting consultation, and post go live warranty help desk support system must support failover redundancy to maintain uptime for 247 safety critical monitoring
The government will award a contract to the offer that represents the best value for the government. the government will conduct a comparative evaluation of all offers received in response to this solicitation and award a contract to the offer that represents the best value for the government.
Offerors must be SBA certified SDVOSBs at the time of offer submission to be eligible for award. Offerors must be sba certified sdvosbs at the time of offer submission to be eligible for award.
When required by the solicitation, product samples shall be submitted prior to the time specified for receipt of quotes. when required by the solicitation, product samples shall be submitted prior to the time specified for receipt of quotes.
Failure to provide materials to show features and capabilities will likely result in a lower evaluation. failure to provide materials will likely result in a lower evaluation.
Technical features and capabilities, past performance, compliance with the statement of work sow, delivery and installation, and warranty, when combined, are more important than price. technical features and capabilities, past performance, compliance with the statement of work sow, delivery and installation, and warranty, when combined, are more important than price.