This is a combined synopsis solicitation for commercial products and services, issued as an RFQ, and set aside for Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business (SDVOSB). The procurement is for a one-time buy of a brand name Mizuho table hana, 110v, with specific standard components. Offerors must submit quotations electronically to ***@***. *. * by 10:00 a. m. Central Standard Time on May 6, 2026. Award will be based on a comparative evaluation of price, technical factors, veterans involvement, and speed of delivery. Required documents include the quotation, authorization letter from OEM, completed copy of items specified in the SOW, product information for or equal products, and a statement of agreement with terms and conditions. Late submissions will be handled according to FAR ****(f). Questions should be forwarded via email to the contracting officer.
The submission of your response shall be received not later than 10:00 a. m. Central Standard Time on May 6, 2026. submission of your response shall be received not later than 10:00 a. m. central standard time on may 6, 2026.
The bid notice mentions payment by electronic funds transfer system for award management (FAR ****) and providing accelerated payments to small business subcontractors (FAR ****), but does not specify the exact payment terms for this contract. The following contract clauses apply to this acquisition: . . . far **** 33, payment by electronic funds transfer system for award management oct 2018 . . . far **** 40, providing accelerated payments to small business subcontractors mar 2023
Award will be based upon a comparative evaluation of quotes in accordance with the simplified acquisition procedures FAR 13. Comparative evaluation is the side by side pairwise comparison of quotes based on factors resulting in a contracting officer decision for the quote most favorable to the government. The following are the decision factors: price technical veterans involvement speed of delivery. award will be based upon a comparative evaluation of quotes in accordance with the simplified acquisition procedures far 13. comparative evaluation is the side by side pairwise comparison of quotes based on factors resulting in a contracting officer decision for the quote most favorable to the government. the following are the decision factors: price technical veterans involvement speed of delivery.
Offerors must complete annual representations and certifications electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM) website. If paragraph j of FAR **** is applicable, a written submission is required. Additionally, offerors must provide an authorization letter or other documents from the OEM verifying they are an authorized dealer, distributor, or reseller. offerors must complete annual representations and certifications electronically via the system for award management sam website located at https:www. sam. gov portal in accordance with far **** 3, offerors representations and certifications commercial products and commercial services. . . . authorization letter or other documents from the oem verifying offeror is an authorized dealer, distributor, or reseller.
The bid notice mentions far **** 3, protest after award deviation nov 2025, but does not specify a deadline for submitting challenges or protests before award. he following contract clauses apply to this acquisition: . . . far **** 3, protest after award deviation nov 2025