Equity Government Bids & RFPs

Proposals must be submitted by email no later than 2:00 PM on Wednesday, June 15, 2026. submit by email no later than 2: 00 pm wednesday, june 15, 2026.

The selection process aims to be as objective as possible, with a contract to be negotiated following selection. in order that the selection process is as objective as possible, do not contact any town of carrboro officials other than noted above.

Proposals should include company profile, project team information, experience in race and equity strategies, summary of similar projects, timeline, and estimated completion schedule. he rfp should address the following information. 1: company profile listing: name, address, year established, type of ownership, sizeof company and staff.

If interviews are conducted, firms should be prepared to be available by Zoom 14 days after the submittal deadline. should the town of carrboro decide to conduct interviews, be prepared to be available by zoom 14 days after submittal deadline.

The town reserves the right to reject any or all packages received or to request additional information. he town of carrboro reserves the right to reject any or all packages received or to request additional information as may be needed to determine qualifications.

Proposals must be uploaded to the website no later than June 16, 2026.

Proposals will be evaluated based on pricing (30%), experience and quality (30%), responsiveness and qualifications (20%), and past performance and references (20%).

Bidders must submit proposals including a statement of interest, description of relevant experience and financial modeling projects, staffing model, proposed fees, and 2-3 references. Organizations must also be able to fulfill KIPP DC's insurance requirements.

Questions from bidders are due by June 12, 2026.

Any proposal not providing the required information or not conforming to the specified format may be disqualified.

Proposals are due by 12 PM local time on June 4, 2026. Proposals due: 12pm local time, june 4, 2026

Proposals will be evaluated based on firm qualifications and experience, qualifications and experience of expert witness, key project personnel, contractor availability, project methodology and approach, and cost. The criteria to consider during evaluations, and the associated point values, are as follows: 1. Firm qualification and experience 10 points 2. Project manager 25 points 3. Key project personnel, subconsultants, and availability of support staff 15 points 4. Contractor availability 5 points 5. Project methodology and approach 25 points 6. Cost 20 points

Firms must provide detailed information on their qualifications and experience in similar areas of expertise, including previous experience with similar Alaska clients. Resumes for key personnel are required. Detail the firms experience in the same or similar areas of expertise, stability, and its adaptability to providing the required services in paragraph 3. 1. 1, including previous experience, if any, with similar alaska clients.

Failure to sign the proposal is grounds for rejection. Failure to sign the proposal is grounds for rejection.

The proposal submission deadline is April 6, 2026.

Payment models include population-based payment (PBP) and a shared risk model for Track 2. Supplemental incentive structure payments are contingent on overall program savings. The total amount paid to each ihp will be based on the number of attributed members and an average base rate for each individual attributed to the ihp.

Proposals will be evaluated on best value, considering sustainability, ability to participate, and additional material or discussions. A minimum score of 60 out of 100 is required in Phase II. The evaluation team will make its recommendation based on the abovedescribed evaluation process.

Responders must pass a required statements review (Phase I) and achieve a minimum score of 60 out of 100 in the evaluation of technical requirements (Phase II). Responders must pass each of the requirements identified in section 3 to move to phase ii.

A lack of improvement or insufficient quality performance could result in modifications or discontinuation of the population-based payment, or intervention by DHS staff, which could include a corrective action plan or termination. A lack of improvement or insufficient quality performance could result in modifications or discontinuation of the population-based payment after the conclusion of an ihps contract cycle, or intervention by dhs staff during the contract cycle, which could include a corrective action plan or termination.

Disqualification may occur if conduct or proposal fails to conform to RFP requirements, or if a minimum score is not achieved. Disqualify any responder whose conduct or proposal fails to conform to the requirements of this rfp.