The State of Oregon is seeking proposals to replace its Alert Immunization Information System (Alert IIS) with a modernized Immunization Information System (IIS). The project aims to integrate existing systems, support data modernization, and align with health equity goals. Proposals are due August 3, 2026. Key requirements include administrative, technical, and preliminary price proposals. The contract is expected to be for 5-10 years with renewal options. The selected vendor will be responsible for delivering, deploying, implementing, hosting, and supporting the IIS solution.
The proposal due date is August 3, 2026. The agency desires to go-live with the solution by December 31, 2027, but is open to extended timelines as long as the solution is live within two years of signing the contract.
Proposals will be evaluated based on administrative and technical criteria, with a total of 5,000 points available. The highest-ranking responsible proposer will be selected.
Proposers must demonstrate a minimum of two years of experience delivering comparable projects, with preference given to those with more experience. Key personnel must have specific certifications and recent experience, including PMP certification for project managers.
The document mentions that the State may elect to conduct site visits of proposers' references or other clients, and the proposer will assist in coordinating these visits.
Proposers are encouraged to provide work samples with their proposal, including a project management plan, solution architecture and design plan, organizational change management plan, testing plan, training plan, implementation plan, or operations maintenance (OM) plan. These samples must not exceed 50 pages each and are excluded from the overall page limit.
Protests to the RFP must be received by the due date and time identified in the schedule, which is 7 calendar days prior to the RFP opening. Protests to an amendment must be submitted by the date specified in the amendment.
A proposal may be rejected if the proposer fails to substantially comply with all RFP procedures and requirements, has delinquent debt owed to the state, fails to meet responsibility requirements, makes inappropriate contact with state representatives, or attempts to influence evaluation committee members.
